Skip to content

Naive about wind project & Project Imperils Historic Site

June 15, 2012

Letter to the editor

Project Imperils Historic Site

June 16, 2012

The Herald’s editorial, “Headwinds” on June 13 on the pros and cons of Reunion Power’s proposal to build 20 490-foot wind turbines on more than five miles of historic Pittsford ridge may have attempted to be balanced, but missed the most significant incompatibility issue with our landscape. The editorial regurgitates Reunion’s talking points: “… already the site of radio towers, with a road … and … a history … of wind generators. …” You have got to be kidding. What about the elephant in the room: the incompatible aesthetic impact of these monstrous machines on Vermont’s historical treasure, the Hubbardton Battlefield.

They would loom over one of the most preserved, pristine battlefields in this country. The units are proposed to be built right across the route the Green Mountain Boys used to evacuate after holding off the Redcoats on July 7, 1777. Seriously? There has to be a better location for wind power than this. This proposed development should never receive permitting from either the state or the federal government because both are charged with protecting and preserving our most significant historical resources.

Naive about wind project
June 15,2012

Wednesday’s editorial was almost cute in its naivete. It said Reunion Power has a good case for building 20 490-foot-tall turbines along a six-mile stretch of ridgeline through four towns because there’s a road providing access to radio towers.

As anyone who’s seen the destruction on Vermont’s Lowell Mountain can tell you, wind developers blast their own roads wherever they want them. At 35 or more feet wide, these roads don’t resemble the dirt mountain road that currently accesses the radio towers on Grandpa’s Knob either. With extensive blasting, tons of stone used, and bridges built they are more like a modern highway. Ironically, the wind turbines may well interfere with radio tower signals anyway.

A common misconception is that wind farms in Vermont will somehow aid in the fight against global warming. While no amount of wind turbines will ever close a baseload power plant, a simpler way to look at it is this: We currently have a glut of electricity on the grid of ISO New England. VELCO, the company responsible for keeping us in a steady supply of electricity, projects at most a minuscule increase in our electricity needs over the next 20 years. The projected lifespan of a wind turbine is 20 years. So how could using the massive amounts of fossil fuel required to build a wind farm in Vermont, to create electricity we don’t need, result in a decrease of global warming carbon emissions?

It’s great the Rutland Herald is writing about this massive project proposed for Rutland County, but now it’s time to dig a little deeper and find out facts. Building wind farms does little more than assuage our consciences in our quest to combat climate change. It makes more sense to do things that actually work.



No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: